<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Wine on Me, Myself, and Technology</title><link>https://kalpik.com/tags/wine/</link><description>Recent content in Wine on Me, Myself, and Technology</description><generator>Hugo -- 0.138.0</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 22:22:10 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://kalpik.com/tags/wine/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Is Wine really faster than Windows?</title><link>https://kalpik.com/2007/04/03/is-wine-really-faster-than-windows/</link><pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 22:22:10 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://kalpik.com/2007/04/03/is-wine-really-faster-than-windows/</guid><description>&lt;p>Would you believe that &lt;a href="http://www.winehq.com/">&lt;!-- raw HTML omitted -->Wine&lt;!-- raw HTML omitted -->&lt;/a>, the open-source, program that enables you to run some Windows programs on Linux, is faster than native Windows XP on the same hardware?&lt;/p>
&lt;p>I have trouble buying that one too, but according to the Wine crew’s &lt;a href="http://wiki.winehq.org/BenchMark-0.9.5">&lt;!-- raw HTML omitted -->latest benchmark runs&lt;!-- raw HTML omitted -->&lt;/a>, it’s true.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>These were primarily graphic tests. Both systems, Windows XP SP 2 and Gentoo with Wine 0.9.5, were asked to show their stuff on a 3.8GHz Intel 570 Pentium box with an 800MHz FSB (front side bus), a gigabyte of 533MHz DDR2 (double data rate) RAM, and a 60GB IDE ATA100 hard drive.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>